I'm sorry, I am quite ill and had to rest for a while. However,after reading the whole autopsy report it appears to me to be more of a document to prove to the world finally that Michael had vitiligo, that he was not a drug addict, and that he had some of same ills as any other human being, none of which would have been at present life threatening. The trial has not even begun and yet the defense has allowed this document incriminating Murray beyond any reasonable doubt to go public worldwide, thus making it a virtual impossibility to find an impartial jury to defend Murray. In jurisprudence this could constitute a mistrial. The prosecution has created a hostile environment for Murray's defense and gained an unfair advantage in so doing. I do not believe Murray will ever see the inside of a jail cell which is perfect if this is indeed a hoax. No long drawn out trial, no waste of taxpayer dollars, and no one goes to jail. Murray is free and so his role is over. HOWEVER, if this is indeed about murder, Michael's people should be very concerned. I have heard no objections, no gag ruling, therefore it tends to make me believe, they are not bothered at all.
There are some pertinent details missing from the autopsy report, and there are some strange inclusions as well. It seems to serve a purpose...to clear up once and for all the misgivings and misinformation that has haunted Michael for much of his career. Should he, or rather, when he reappears, these haunts will be null and void.
What do you think?